<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Learning and Skills Group webinars: a success story</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlignment.com/2009/11/learning-and-skills-group-webinars-a-success-story/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlignment.com/2009/11/learning-and-skills-group-webinars-a-success-story/</link>
	<description>The art of online communication</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:46:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tui xach thoi trang</title>
		<link>http://onlignment.com/2009/11/learning-and-skills-group-webinars-a-success-story/comment-page-1/#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator>tui xach thoi trang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 09:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlignment.com/?p=489#comment-328</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Good points…I would note that as someone who really doesn’t comment to blogs much (in fact, this may be my first post), I don’t think the term “lurker” is very flattering to a non-posting reader. It’s not your fault in the least , but perhaps the blogosphere could come up with a better, non-creepy name for the 90% of us that enjoy reading the content .&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points…I would note that as someone who really doesn’t comment to blogs much (in fact, this may be my first post), I don’t think the term “lurker” is very flattering to a non-posting reader. It’s not your fault in the least , but perhaps the blogosphere could come up with a better, non-creepy name for the 90% of us that enjoy reading the content .</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

