<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who purchases the virtual classroom?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlignment.com/2009/10/who-purchases-the-virtual-classroom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlignment.com/2009/10/who-purchases-the-virtual-classroom/</link>
	<description>The art of online communication</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:49:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://onlignment.com/2009/10/who-purchases-the-virtual-classroom/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlignment.com/?p=420#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Amen, and amen, and amen... but it&#039;s worse than that Clive. I&#039;m basically an SME with a sideline training remit; and had to run a subversive campaign against my IT department who wanted to buy a webconferencing product that was easy for them to service/support, but utterly useless for engaging &amp; interactive learning delivery or our multinational low-bandwidth webconferencing needs. Since then, there are dispersed areas of the organisation running full tilt at elearning in many different ways, and for the central &#039;corporate l&amp;d&#039; department, supporting, coordinating or providing any overarching policy, pedagogical &amp; systemic architecture for elearning is still (1 year on) &#039;not a priority&#039;.

le sigh. welcome to enterprise 2.0.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen, and amen, and amen&#8230; but it&#8217;s worse than that Clive. I&#8217;m basically an SME with a sideline training remit; and had to run a subversive campaign against my IT department who wanted to buy a webconferencing product that was easy for them to service/support, but utterly useless for engaging &amp; interactive learning delivery or our multinational low-bandwidth webconferencing needs. Since then, there are dispersed areas of the organisation running full tilt at elearning in many different ways, and for the central &#8216;corporate l&amp;d&#8217; department, supporting, coordinating or providing any overarching policy, pedagogical &amp; systemic architecture for elearning is still (1 year on) &#8216;not a priority&#8217;.</p>
<p>le sigh. welcome to enterprise 2.0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
