Cisco shows the way with TelePresence

This week’s Economist contains an interesting feature on Cisco. In Reshaping Cisco: The world according to Chambers, the article reports on Cisco’s own prolific use of it’s top-end video conferencing tool TelePresence:

“The firm—to borrow a choice Silicon Valley expression—eats a lot of its own dog food: digital tools that allow cheap and efficient communication. These include wikis, social networking and web-based collaboration services, of course. But the most important tool is TelePresence, so that nuances such as body language and tone of voice, essential ingredients of face-to-face meetings, are no longer lost. The number of TelePresence meetings at Cisco averages 5,500 a week. This has also helped the firm to cut its annual travel budget by $290m, or more than half.”

Edufire – live video learning

edufire

Edufire provides a very different take on synchronous online learning. This new site brings together teachers and students for webcam-based online classes. These could be on any subject imaginable, but right now the majority are for language learning.

As a teacher, you set your own price and EduFire takes 15% of the sales. Sounds like a good deal to me and the exact reverse of the usual royalties you’d expect from a book publisher.

In true Web 2.0 style, the teachers are rated, so demand for the good ones (and presumably the price) will increase, while the poor teachers will look in vain for somewhere to hide.

Pecha-kucha online

In reading Garr Reynold’s excellent Presentation Zen, I came across a great idea for webinars called Pecha-kucha. Apparently, Pecha-kucha (Japanese for chatter) was started in 2003 by Tokyo expatriate architects Mark Dytham and Astrid Klein as an alternative presentation format. Each speaker has 20 slides, each of which must be shown for 20 seconds, with which to tell their story or make their point. The slides advance automatically and so after 6 minutes and 40 seconds you’re done.

According to Reynolds, Pecha-kucha nights are now being held in over 80 cities around the world. I reckon a Pecha-kucha hour would work just great as the basis for a webinar.

Now all I’ve got to work out is how to pronounce it.

Web meetings, webinars and virtual classrooms compared

Unless I’ve missed something important, there seem to be three distinct uses for real-time online commmunications. The following table represents a first attempt at clarifying the discriminating characteristics of these three:

  Web meetings Webinars Virtual classrooms
Primary purpose To solve problems and make decisions To share ideas and experiences To facilitate learning
Secondary purposes To provide updates To promote the speaker or organiser None
Face-to-face equivalent A short business meeting A session at a seminar or conference A classroom session
Who’s in charge? The chair of the meeting The host and/or presenter The teacher / trainer
Typical activities Presentation of situation updates and proposals; discussion of proposals; decision-making; action planning Presentation of ideas and experiences; demonstrations; polling of audience opinion; Q&A; discussion; participant-to-participant text chat (back channel) Ice  breakers; presentation of formal content; software demos (for IT training); group exercises and activities; discussion; formative and summative assessment
Visual focus Participant webcams; shared documents; slides Slides; presenter webcam; text chat; polls; website tours Slides; electronic whiteboard; questions/polls; shared applications; website tours; text chat
Auditory focus Participants’ vocal contributions Host / presenters’ voices; possibly also participants’ vocal contributions Teacher/trainer’s voice and participants’ vocal contributions
Most frequently used interactive devices Voice; text chat Voice; text chat; polls Voice; text chat; electronic whiteboard; questions/polls; application sharing; break-out rooms
Tangible outputs Agreed actions / minutes Recordings; participant feedback Recordings; participant feedback; assessment scores

If you believe there are other, distinct forms, or feel you could refine or add to this table, I’d love to hear from you.

A first time user’s hints and tips

I was interested in the experiences of web conferencing beginners Devon County Council as reported on the Towards Maturity site – see Devon County Council improves efficiency with web conferencing. In particular I thought I’d share their hints and tips:

  • If you are conducting a programme for over 16, you need to have 2 of you supporting learners, one leading the event and the other supporting individuals via the chat room.
  • We found that a half day workshop could be compressed into a 1 hour webinar.
  • If you are asking staff to interact with the content (through note taking, mind maps etc) then an hour on the end of a telephone is quite a lot – it’s better to make a small investment in headphones that can be loaned to staff on the programme which leaves their hands free.
  • Make sure you have a quiet venue to conduct the session from – an open plan office isn’t the best.
  • PC’s in the council are timed to shut down if inactive for a certain period – we had to be proactive in introducing time for ‘mouse wiggle’ into the programme – a bit of fun that kept both staff and their machines engaged!
  • Without the face-to-face contact, we found that we had to concentrate on varying style and content within the webinar to engage staff.

How people buy webinars

Lee Salz runs an interesting blog called Business Expert Webinars, which focuses on the business of selling webinars. Yes, you read that correctly, places at webinars can be sold – they don’t have to be freebies. In The Unique Buying Process in For-Fee Webinars, Lee describes how differently the buying process works when you’re offering free and paid-for events:

  • When the webinar’s for free, the majority of attendees register a month in advance, probably on the basis of the first promotion. However, as Lee explains, “only 25 – 35% will show up to the free webinar since they did not make a commitment to attend.”
  • With a paid-for event, the process is the exact opposite. The prospect makes a note of when the webinar is to be held, then waits right until the last moment to see whether they will be free to attend. Once they’ve made the payment, they’ll definitely turn up.

There’s no reason why someone shouldn’t pay for a place at a webinar, as long as the topic is sufficiently interesting and there is no hidden agenda, usually promotional. After all, they pay big bucks to see the same speakers at face-to-face events.

White boredom

The white board is a ubiquitous piece of hardware that you find in classrooms and board rooms all around the world. In some cases it is used as little more than a notice board, or as a convenient close-up projector screen. In other situations it is used (rarely) as a highly interactive aid to group work and decision-making.

It is also common to find a whiteboard in the virtual environment. It may be a self-contained piece of software, and there is a plethora of open source and free examples from which to choose online. Typically it is found nesting inside web-conferencing and virtual classroom tools such as Cisco WebEx, Saba Centra, Adobe Connect and Elluminate.

In my experience it is most often employed only as a carrier for slides that have been prepared in advance. It is uncommon for people to be aware of the versatile uses to which it might be put; they are more likely to be ignorant of its existence altogether.

In essence the modern whiteboard is held back by its heritage, the old-fashioned blackboard. It is significant to note that the term ‘chalk and talk’ came from a rubric in which a teacher or lecturer stood at the front of a class and, well, just talked. If there were any interaction at all it would be to take notes or answer the occasional question whose main purpose was to catch you out in case you succumbed to terminal boredom.

In this and subsequent blogs I’ll talk about whiteboards. I’ll give examples of the sorts of uses to which they are, have been, and might be put in the service of education and training. I’ll be making the point that the online whiteboard (OWB) is perhaps the most underused of resources. I’ll describe how it might be used to advance interactive, constructivist and experiential learning, for dynamic communication, problem-solving, to support collaborative team work and action-planning.

I’ll also offer some comparisons of form and functionality to help you to choose a system that meets your need. I hope readers will contribute their own examples and correct any inaccuracies where I comment on the scope and limitations of various different OWB systems.

Please come back soon for more on white boards and how to resist “white boredom”.

Moving in mysterious ways

There is an old joke about an apprentice stonemason in Yorkshire. He is given authority to etch his first eulogy on a gravestone, and sets to work. Returning to his employer for approval, the apprentice proudly reveals his work. The lettering is perfect, but the text reads, “Lord, he was thin.” “Go back,” says the Master, “and add the missing “e”. The end result is “Ee Lord, he was thin”.

The story came to mind during a conversation with my sister recently. This avowed agnostic told me she’d been to church. She described the experience to me.

“I met others at the entrance. They had come to worship, to socialise, and to feel part of a community. There was a choir, and I joined in as the congregation sang at full belt. It was like a scene from Sister Act, complete with revivalist band. Then came the sermon, thought-provoking and emphatic. I dropped a few quid into the collection tray. Members who were suffering or celebrating called upon us all to share in their prayers.”

“No-one at all remarked on how I was dressed, which is just as well since it was a warm and sultry morning and I was still dressed in my nightie (very minimal – I’ll spare you the detail). Newcomers like myself were offered mentoring to keep us on the straight and narrow road to Salvation.”

I asked my sister which church she’d attended that had been so accepting of this exhibitionism. “The Church of South Las Vegas”, she replied.

“Las Vegas, Nevada, USA?”, I queried. “That’s more than 5,000 miles away!”

“Oh yes,” she confirmed, “I was just curious to know how it would feel to interact with thousands of others from all around the world in a live service, online!”

This is not the only way in which religious communities are using technology. It is becoming commonplace for them to use Facebook, Twitter and other social media both in synchronous and own-time mode.

If you should drop by http://www.thechurchlvlive.com/ and you find the doors barred in Southern Las Vegas, don’t worry. You’ll be able to leave a message for the online prayer team who’ll surely put in a word for you. But best mind your Ps and Qs. E-Lord, you never know who might be moderating.

FOOTNOTE A swift explanation for readers from outside the UK. Yorkshire is a county in England, where some people speak with a distinctive regional accent. The expression “Ee bah gum” is stereotypical and loosely equates with “Well I never”.

The title of this blog echoes the hymn by William Cowper (1731-1800), “God moves in a mysterious way His wonders to perform; He plants his footsteps in the sea, and rides upon the storm”.

Where to get free images for your slides

Thanks to Jane Hart for drawing my attention to this collection of web sites where you can find stock photography and other images that are free of charge:

12 places to get free images for your site, TechRadar, 12 August 2009.

The multitask assumption

The multitask assumption. Sounds like a good name for a spy film, probably starring someone like Michael Caine, and with a plot so intricate that you never really know which side each character is on – who’s a friend and who’s an enemy.

So what is the multitask assumption? It’s the assumption you can safely make with any webinar that a good proportion of the audience is multitasking – you know, checking emails, answering the phone, listening to music, finishing off a report, and so on. They intend to concentrate on your webinar – after all, that’s why they signed up – but they just can’t help themselves, the distractions are so persistent and so inviting.

This sounds like a situation where it’s quite clear who’s a friend and who’s an enemy: the friends are those who are listening to you with rapt attention; the enemies all those others who can’t even pay you the respect of tuning in with all faculties engaged for a single hour of their lives.

But are these people your enemies? Do you behave any differently when you’re attending someone else’s webinar? I don’t think so. For many, attending a webinar is like listening to the radio or watching TV – you tune in and out depending on the the attractiveness of what else is on offer. You would do exactly the same if you were at a conventional meeting or conference too, but you can’t because it looks bad; it’s disrespectful and insensitive.

As far as participants are concerned, multitasking is a benefit of the webinar format, not a drawback. For the facilitator, it’s a challenge. You could fight it by insisting on continual interactivity, demanding that participants use webcams so you can see what they’re up to (I know, not really practical for more than a small group), or using one of these new platforms that let you know when each participants’ web conferencing window is active or submerged behind a host of others.

Here’s what Ken Molay had to say in Must your webinar be interactive? on The Webinar Blog: ‘I prefer to work on presentation style and techniques that subtly (or not so subtly) refocus attention on your content and your presentation, over and over, in a continuous barrage of attention recapture cues. I assume that people are multitasking and drifting. So I use vocal pitch and speed changes to recapture their auditory attention and interest. I use verbal directions that tell them to refocus on the screen: “So, as you see at the top of the first column…” or “Look at the picture I used to illustrate this concept…” And of course I use direct interactions through chat dialogs, polls, whiteboards, or other technology features. But even when you have strong content and do everything right, you can simply get an audience that prefers a passive experience.’

A webinar is not a virtual classroom session (see So what exactly is a webinar?). With a webinar, there isn’t the expectation that there would be in a classroom that everybody should be fully engaged and participate in every activity. So by all means try your hardest to maintain their attention – after all, you must believe that what you have to say is important – but don’t get upset if you don’t succeed. Assume multitasking and don’t take it personally.