<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So are webinars effective?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlignment.com/2009/06/so-are-webinars-effective/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlignment.com/2009/06/so-are-webinars-effective/</link>
	<description>The art of online communication</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:46:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Ferguson</title>
		<link>http://onlignment.com/2009/06/so-are-webinars-effective/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Ferguson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlignment.com/?p=177#comment-12</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not surprised that half the organizations offering webinars rarely if ever measure their effectiveness.  If you considered the face-to-face training that fails to measure, or measures only with smile sheets in the last hour of the session, I think you&#039;d find similar numbers.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As for as the cost comparison goes, often it&#039;s an apples-to-cucumbers situation, like direct salary while in the webinar versus travel and living to attend instructor-led training.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I suspect that many webinars are essentially streamed lectures, with maybe a dash of polling thrown in for interactivity:  Todd from Engineering explains the new division structure; Lucille from Benefits teaches you about the stock-option plan.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To measure effectiveness, you have to think about what effectiveness means.  If it means more than &quot;nice webinar, great graphics,&quot; you have to think about meaningful outcomes.  Or admit to yourself that &quot;talked to staff about the new division&quot; is all the accomplishment you care about.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not surprised that half the organizations offering webinars rarely if ever measure their effectiveness.  If you considered the face-to-face training that fails to measure, or measures only with smile sheets in the last hour of the session, I think you&#8217;d find similar numbers.</p>

<p>As for as the cost comparison goes, often it&#8217;s an apples-to-cucumbers situation, like direct salary while in the webinar versus travel and living to attend instructor-led training.</p>

<p>I suspect that many webinars are essentially streamed lectures, with maybe a dash of polling thrown in for interactivity:  Todd from Engineering explains the new division structure; Lucille from Benefits teaches you about the stock-option plan.</p>

<p>To measure effectiveness, you have to think about what effectiveness means.  If it means more than &#8220;nice webinar, great graphics,&#8221; you have to think about meaningful outcomes.  Or admit to yourself that &#8220;talked to staff about the new division&#8221; is all the accomplishment you care about.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

